N
nmz56789
Guest
1. Is the noVBV verification tool 100% accurate? It seems like a website can only roughly confirm whether it's a 2D site through its source code, but accurate confirmation is still only verified by entering the information, right?
2. Also, I checked whether the site has 3D verification. As I understand it, if you check for visa security signs and other information through F12, you can only confirm that 3D verification should be enabled on these signs. However, the absence of a sign doesn't prove that it shouldn't have 3D verification. After all, it seems like entering the information is only necessary to see if the OTP verification code has slipped through.
3. And using tools like wappalyzer can, to a certain extent, allow us to understand which payment methods they use, such as Visa, Stripe, and PayPal, but ultimately we still can't determine the level of fraudulent activity the store is using.
4. Based on the method described above, it seems we're back to the sandbox testing phase. After all, the only way is to use map data for direct testing?
5. Is this correct? Or is there a better solution? Can we determine whether a website is 2D-verified or 3D-verified without directly determining map information?
2. Also, I checked whether the site has 3D verification. As I understand it, if you check for visa security signs and other information through F12, you can only confirm that 3D verification should be enabled on these signs. However, the absence of a sign doesn't prove that it shouldn't have 3D verification. After all, it seems like entering the information is only necessary to see if the OTP verification code has slipped through.
3. And using tools like wappalyzer can, to a certain extent, allow us to understand which payment methods they use, such as Visa, Stripe, and PayPal, but ultimately we still can't determine the level of fraudulent activity the store is using.
4. Based on the method described above, it seems we're back to the sandbox testing phase. After all, the only way is to use map data for direct testing?
5. Is this correct? Or is there a better solution? Can we determine whether a website is 2D-verified or 3D-verified without directly determining map information?